There is a lot of speculation about whether 2010 will be the year VDI hits its stride.  We all know intuitively there is a huge market for desktop virtualization given the large installed base of PCs that need to be refreshed - the questions are, how quickly will this market adopt desktop virtualization and is the technology addressing needs sufficiently  to drive broad market acceptance?

Our point-of-view, from having worked with VDI over the past decade, is that the demand for virtual desktops is real, but for widespread adoption two things are needed: the technology needs to be less expensive than PCs and it must be easy to use.

Interestingly, several studies have pointed out the same - just this week I just saw an article from a business consulting firm who said that most VDI proof-of-concepts are failing.

The first two of their three reasons relate to cost and the corresponding value.As they say, "customers must replace cheap desktop computing and storage with expensive datacenter computing cycles.  This is a major upfront capital expenditure that is difficult to justify in a tough economy."

We consistently hear this from our customers - companies want to do more with less. The question they ask is: "How can I use my PC replacement budget to deploy virtual desktops and get a lower TCO without needing a datacenter forklift or changes to my business processes?"

This is the exact problem Kaviza addresses - our patent-pending architecture eliminates the need for expensive infrastructure and shared storage, and scales on inexpensive commodity hardware.  All the desktop provisioning and management functionality is built-in, so you can simply load Kaviza on any hypervisor-enabled workstation grade server, and go, and it is designed to be managed by desktop IT.  Try how easy it is, and let us know what you think.

Labels: complexity, cost, Desktop Virtualization, fail, hot trend, Kaviza, proof-of-concept, Terminal Services, VDI

A news item caught my attention a few days back:  a Pa. school district was accused of using the webcams on school issued laptops to spy on a student at his home.  This raises an interesting issue of where to draw the line between access and privacy - especially as several school districts are considering issuing laptops to middle and high school students.

The reason schools want to provide students with computers is benign and noble - they want students to easily have access to all the software programs and tools they need to do their school work without having to buy and install these themselves. But the question is, should schools be issuing laptops?  Not only does this raise privacy issues, but it also adds to management and oversight headaches - schools now have to keep these laptops patched and up-to-date, they have to track these assets, update them, etc.

There is of course a better way - school districts could provide students with virtual desktops that have all the software applications and tools the student would need to do their school work.  Students can access these virtual desktops from anywhere - from their home computer, from a computer at the library, etc.  This solves several issues: i) schools don't have to be in the business of managing physical laptops or patching them - they simply update the templates for these virtual desktops periodically and the changes get propagated automatically the next time the students login, ii) privacy is ensured since the virtual desktops can be locked down to restrict access, so schools can enforce policies easily using the desktop templates, and iii) this option provides students with anytime, anywhere access without having to carry around a laptop and manage it.

All the school districts we speak with are very receptive to virtual desktops - they love the simplicity, the ease of management, and the affordability that solutions like Kaviza's offer.  Don't take my word for it, try it for yourself.

Labels: Desktop Virtualization, Kaviza, privacy, School laptops, security, VDI, virtual desktops

Here is a video chalk talk describing why we founded Kaviza, the shortcomings of VDI today and how Kaviza's architecture addresses VDI cost & complexity. Take a look and let me know what you think!

Labels: Citrix, Desktop Virtualization, Kaviza, VDI, Video, VMWare, YouTube

Today is an exciting day for us at Kaviza. We launched a beta  of our multi-box virtual desktop appliance which offers built-in high availability. 

You can setup a highly available farm of virtual desktop servers by simply loading Kaviza on two or more commodity servers and linking them together.  It is truly that simple - no custom coding, no expensive SAN's, high speed interconnects, or high end servers are needed.  Our entire solution can be setup from scratch in under three hours.  With Kaviza's unique shared-nothing, Google-esque architecture, you get a highly scalable solution at a very low cost.  There is no single point of failure, and features like high-availability are built-in.

And the best part is that our virtual desktops cost less than a PC to deploy - our fully loaded cost (including the server, our software, MS, the hypervisor, and other licenses, thin client) is cheaper than a PC.

We are encouraged by the response we are getting from early trial users on this release. Here is some feedback we have received from beta partners and customers:

"Now I see why you say it's "turnkey". We got the whole thing up and running on multiple servers in just a few hours."

"Neat architecture, solves the fundamental awkardness with VDI."

"My team is raving about your solution."

You can either download a free trial of our single box version here, or register here if you would like to try the multi-box version.  We would love to get your feedback, let us know what you think!

Labels: Desktop Virtualization, High-Avaialbility, New Release, Product Announcement, VDI